Category Archives: Movies

The new Star Wars and why fans should be upset

Star_Wars_The_Force_AwakensIf you’re like me and millions of other Americans, your anticipation for the new Star Wars film “The Force Awakens” could hardly be contained. We eagerly scoured the internet for predictions, reviews, and any information we could. Hell, many of us even teetered on the thought of buying that authentic stormtrooper outfit. From merchandising to advertising, it is undebatable that this is one of the most profitable movies ever to hit the big screen, and for good reason. The film that started it all, “Episode IV A New Hope,” created a cult following the likes have never been seen from a single movie. I think part of the reason that the original was so beloved was due to its originality and creativity. During a time when many Americans were looking up to the stars and truly feeling like they were closer than ever, Star Wars expanded our imaginations into that final frontier and instilled a sense of adventure that seemed to be absent in our monotonous society. Perhaps it was the desire to capture this feeling again that drew all those to the opening day of this new addition to the franchise, and I can honestly say that at least something will seem familiar in watching this movie. While the film certainly captured the “Star Wars” feel, it fell far, far away from its hype, which admittably still leaves it a fine movie since its hype was so high. However, fans of Star Wars who see this film should be upset for the following reasons.

 

**Spoilers Ahead**

 

1.) The movie’s plot:

The background is a futuristic society in a far away galaxy. A service droid is entrusted with some vital information before being abandoned on some desert planet. While being chased by an evil organization, the droid finds a force sensitive teen who has no parents and nowhere else to go or do. The droid and the teen then run into Han Solo who flies them to meet more allies. They later meet up with a rebel alliance who plan to use fighter ships to take out a large moon-like weapon that can destroy whole planets, which it ultimately demonstrates. The whole while, they are apprehended by an evil user of the force, wielding a red lightsaber, robed and masked in black, who is taking orders from a higher up. The rebels exploit the weapon’s weakness and blow it up, while a main character dies in front of the new protagonist.

Name that movie. This should seem like a no brainer, but after Dec. 17th, this actually describes two movies! This right here should be the number one complaint, that the “new” Star Wars film shares the same plot as the original film: “A New Hope.” While the movie’s plot was executed excellently, it relies on nostalgia over originality. This itself is fine for all those with an “If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it” philosophy, but I have a feeling that these people would be much more satisfied watching episode 4 on their VHS at home and are not likely amused by anything ever playing at a cinema anyway. Let’s admit it, we all were expecting something new and creative, not the same story all over again. Sure, some minute details are different, like the family relations, the sex of the main character, and that there’s even a black guy, but these don’t constitute an original plot. If so, “The Hangover 2” can be considered a completely revolutionary storyline never been done before. Personally, I can’t believe they tried to use the Death Star a THIRD time (the first two times worked so well, am I right). The point is, Disney wanted to go the safe and easy route by recycling a well-liked plot, perhaps to gain the trust of the audience after the generally disliked prequels. What an unbelievable insult to J.J. Abrams and the writers at Disney to think they cant learn from those mistakes an make a new, enjoyable plot. In fact, the movie made all this money with the plot being completely unknown anyway, so they didn’t save a dime doing it this way. This was a poor move on Disney and hopefully the last of the recycled plots we will see in the new franchise.

 

2.) The movie’s title:

“The Force Awakens.” Just like how many Star Wars fans were upset with the title of episode 1 “The Phantom Menance,” This title fails to do justice for the expectation of the film and in hindsight, is not very acurate either. While the word “awakens” does beckon to the fact that this is a new trilogy, this is a recycled movie plot and hardly “new,” being that it is the seventh movie in the franchise. So…what then? Was the force just asleep this whole time? Obviously it’s supposed to describe Rey who comes into her jedi powers in the movie, but she is actually far from absent of them in the begining. We see first off that she is able to understand BB-8, a beeping droid, instantly; a trait that for humans seems to only be found in the force sensitive, especially the skywalker family (remember Luke and R2-D2). She also is very familiar with the millennium falcon despite not having previously flown it, and was able to out-fly two TIE Fighters. Aye, the force is not asleep in her. The title could/should have been more dramatic or exciting.

3.) The villian:

file_607335_jar-jar-star-wars-force-awakensIn this movie, we see a new villian who will most likely be around for the remaining episodes in this trilogy. He has an awsome backstory, a fiendish obsession, and much hate within him, but somehow falls short of the villian that this new trilogy deserves. His soul is in constant struggle between the dark and light, making him weak-willed and short tempered at times. While Darth Vader may have some shoes to fill (for the audience and Kylo Ren), it’s clear that Disney’s intent was to make a villian who could easily change sides if they choose. The problem is, the more sympathy or pity you throw a bad guy, the less bad they become. While some don’t mind this fact, let’s remember why Vader is such a beloved villian. He is powerful, calm, and unquestionably evil. While he does go back to the light, that doesn’t take place till the end of the story where he needed to die anyway. Star Wars needs another character with these traits because we all love to hate someone, and without villians, there would be no conflict or story at all; we’d probably just be left with dancing ewoks. Aditionally, Adam Driver was probably one of the least intimidating people to be hired to play Kylo. Not to harsh his excellent acting in the film, but I can’t take him seriously with that 8th grade mustache and professor Snape’s hairdo.

4.) Captain Phasma:

We’ve known about this character for awhile from the movie’s marketing , but she gets, what, maybe a whole 2 minutes screen time  (don’t quote me on that). For a named character, she played almost no part in this movie. Hell, I would rather know the name/code of the storm trooper with the gravity hammer that fought Finn. Hopefully she will be a bigger character in the next films but yet again, an example of expectations that fell short.

5.) The First Order:

Ok, so there’s a new evil organization that replaced the Empire, I dig that. There obviously has to be some antagonist, but the truth of the matter is, this is NOT the Empire which we are familiar with. The First Order should not have nearly as many troops or resources as the now reestablished Republic which we would hope is supplying the Resistance. However, the Resistance seems no bigger, if not smaller than the old Rebellion Army which didn’t have a government to support them. And if the Republic didn’t supply the Resistance, then what the fuck are they doing? The First Order had built in the last 30 year a new fucking death star and they are just going to stay out of it!?!? If anything, the size difference between the old Empire and the Rebellion Army should have been reversed in this movie, and who knows, maybe they really are, but the Resistance sure was short of fighter pilots on that last assault.

 

I believe that the above criticisms of the new Star Wars film are both acurate  and deserving. Furthermore, they alone should be enough for the Star Wars fans to be upset with the new film. Many critic and fans seem to place this new movie on a pedestal that it really doesn’t deserve. This is probably due to that, as a “cult following,” many fans put on rose colored glasses before and after leaving the theater, enthralled in the nostalgia of seeing their beloved Star Wars with the stunning CGI scenes it deserves. That being said, by no means did I dislike the film, and definitely believe it is worth the ticket price. I was entertained, just slightly disappointed at the same time. In keeping to this post’s topic, I have yet to describe what I enjoyed about the film and what Disney did right, which whould probably make a list just as long if not longer than this one. Personally, I believe Rey has the makings to become  my favorite jedi yet, and I can’t wait to see who her father really is and her whole back story. In all, I give the film a 7/10. To sum up, the film had its flaws, but mainly due to it’s expectations being too high to realistically deliver on. Thanks for reading and hopefully you found my post insightful.

The Lego Movie review

the-lego-movieI feel quite safe in saying that any childhood memory of Legos is always positive. Everyone with an imagination and these colorful blocks literally build worlds, universes, crazy vehicles, people and awsome stories the likes of which would inspire, captivate, and bring joy for many. It is for this reason that I embarked to see the Lego Movie, despite my older age. I can assure you this, however: I was far from disappointed. Everything truly is awesome in this sure to become classic animated film in which the fun literally nevelego movier stops. Comedy, romance, and enough action to satisfy lovers of literally any movie genera (there is even a western scene), this movie is sure to do anything but disapoint. Whilst I don’t want to spoil any parts, I will say that the movie is outstandingly funny, and is sure to make laugh people of all ages, guaranteed. In addition, it holds an outstanding voice cast which includes (but is not limited to): Morgan Freeman, Hugh Jackman, Charlie Day, Liam Neeson, and even Shaq! Whilst sporting such comedic dialog as you will be repeating all year, the movie’s story and morals will make you remember how you felt building that spaceship or skyscraper as a child. This film teaches us to not strive for uniformity, but to build with our hearts and not the instruction booklet. Everyone is special and can change the universe if you believe in yourself. This is why I fell in love with this movie, because its morals are not cliché and truly do inspire. If you want to fall in love with Legos all over again and have a few laughs along the way, this movie cannot be understated.

All in all, I give it a 9/10 for animated films and a solid 7/10 for all films. Go see this movie!

Until next time, I’m Edward Plaza; “And Theeerrres the Ball!”

Iron Man 3 review (spoiler alert)

Ok, so I’m guessing most people had good expectations for Iron Man 3 due to the popularitshitty iron many and success of both Iron Man 1 and The Avengers. Sorry to all those who were hoping for a “blockbuster great,” but this movie was basically shit for a couple of reasons. First and foremost was the expectation and misleading use of the trailers. Our hopes were up and then like the feces of a pigeon, came crashing down about halfway through. Let’s now talk specific plot holes and retarded (sorry, I mean SPECIAL) scenes. To start, Tony stark basically has all these suits, yet only uses one throughout the whole movie and while it is the latest edition supposedly, It almost never works. Aside from that, He apparently has a bunch of other suits that can run themselves (technically by Jarvis) and while I can see how others would find this tidbit “cool,” I find it very absurd and farfetched to say the least. Why? Because he seems to have and endless supply of them and this whole idea takes away some of the glory of the original Iron Man utilized by Tony. If he has all these suits, what is the point of even manning one (think about it)? Next, and this is probably the worst of all, the Mandarin isn’t even the villain like we were all led to believe. The character in the previews is a short, wise cracking British drug addict who is not only pitiful, but way too goofy. Who is the enemy you ask? It’s some dumb company called AIM (which admittedly is based on the comics). Here’s the kicker: the boss can make his body really hot and breathe fire. Also he can regenerate himself. To top it off, he has a bunch of henchmen who can do the same. Now what was the point of having a fake Mandarin in the plot when I’m sure we were all anticipating a badass terrorist? Perhaps Marvel wanted a more believable enemy (10 magic rings from outer space are a little farfetched, right?). O, forgive me for finding a fire-breathing CEO much more believable. All in all, the writers and the director didn’t take this movie very seriously. We all can agree, hopefully, that a bit of comedy is great for action movies to liven up the mood. This movie almost sets out to be a complete comedy, however. In short, the movie wasn’t serious as a good action should be. Well what about the climax scene? There was very pitiful fighting and basically none by Tony or Iron Patriot (this character could have been taken out entirely and no one would care). In the end, Tony gets his shrapnel taken out. WTF! So this whole time he didn’t even need that damn arc reactor which made such a big deal in Iron Man 2!?! Anyway, I suppose that this movie will be seen by all those who know what to expect anyway seeing as 1.) They won’t believe the reviews or 2.) It doesn’t matter: you have to see Iron Man 3 to get caught up for the Avengers 2, right? Well go see it for yourself, but don’t say I didn’t warn you.

 

All in all, I give it a 6/10